This are code execution styles / patterns, not broker execution. I will be breaking them down from the most basic/slow (in terms of flexibility and verbosity) to the fastest/most optimized styles, detailed explanations with code examples which will help you when creating an EA
1. Fully Expanded / Verbose Execution (Baseline) Everything is spelled out. No shortcuts. No chaining.
Code
void OnTick() { double fast = iMA(_Symbol, PERIOD_CURRENT, 10, 0, MODE_SMA, PRICE_CLOSE, 0); double slow = iMA(_Symbol, PERIOD_CURRENT, 50, 0, MODE_SMA, PRICE_CLOSE, 0); if(fast > slow) { if(PositionsTotal() == 0) { trade.Buy(0.1); } } }
Feel Safe, Clear, Kinda bulky
2. Condensed If Execution You remove nesting and compress conditions.
Code
void OnTick() { if(iMA(_Symbol,0,10,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0) > iMA(_Symbol,0,50,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0) && PositionsTotal() == 0) { trade.Buy(0.1); } }
What changed No temp variables, Logic inline
Tradeoff Harder to debug, Slightly faster (less variable overhead, but negligible)
3. Inline Execution (Single-Statement If) Now we drop the braces — one condition → one action.
Code
void OnTick() { if(iMA(_Symbol,0,10,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0) > iMA(_Symbol,0,50,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0) && PositionsTotal() == 0) trade.Buy(0.1); }
Feel Cleaner, More "trader style"
4. Ternary Execution (Compact Decision Style) Now you start using ? : like a sniper.
Code
void OnTick() { (iMA(_Symbol,0,10,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0) > iMA(_Symbol,0,50,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0)) ? trade.Buy(0.1) : trade.Sell(0.1); }
Reality check Looks slick, But dangerous in trading (you don't always want auto sell) Most pros only use ternary for values, not orders.
5. True One-Line Execution This is what you were hinting at.
Code
void OnTick() { if(PositionsTotal()==0 && iMA(_Symbol,0,10,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0) > iMA(_Symbol,0,50,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0)) trade.Buy(0.1); }
Or even tighter:
if(PositionsTotal()==0 && iMA(_Symbol,0,10,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0) > iMA(_Symbol,0,50,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0)) trade.Buy(0.1);
Feel Fast, Aggressive, Zero fluff
Hidden cost Re-computes indicators multiple times, Ugly when logic grows
6. Macro / Inline Function Execution Now this is where experienced devs get clever.
You hide complexity behind tiny wrappers.
Code
#define BUY_SIGNAL (iMA(_Symbol,0,10,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0) > iMA(_Symbol,0,50,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0)) void OnTick() { if(PositionsTotal()==0 && BUY_SIGNAL) trade.Buy(0.1); }
Why this hits Still one-line execution, But readable, Reusable
7. Chained Execution Style (Advanced Compact Logic) You combine multiple conditions + actions in one flow.
Code
void OnTick() { if(PositionsTotal()==0 && (iMA(_Symbol,0,10,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0) > iMA(_Symbol,0,50,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0) ? trade.Buy(0.1) : trade.Sell(0.1))); }
Honest truth This is where things start getting too clever.
It works… but if something breaks, you'll hate your past self 😅
8. Lambda-Style / Expression Execution (MT5 Advanced) MQL5 supports function-style compact execution patterns.
Code
void Execute(bool condition) { if(condition) trade.Buy(0.1); } void OnTick() { Execute(iMA(_Symbol,0,10,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0) > iMA(_Symbol,0,50,0,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0)); }
Feel Clean, Reusable, Almost like functional programming
Real Talk (this is the part people don't say)
When I first discovered one-line execution, I thought:
"Yeah… this is it. This is pro-level."
Then a few weeks later, debugging hit me like a truck.
Because in trading:
You don't just need speed
You need control + traceability
So the real balance most experienced devs land on is:
Compact logic, but not cryptic
One-line triggers, but precomputed signals
The "Sweet Spot" Most Pros Use
Something like this:
bool buy = maFast[0] > maSlow[0]; if(PositionsTotal()==0 && buy) trade.Buy(0.1);
Why this wins Execution is still one-line, Logic is separated, Debugging is easy
Bottom line
From slow → fast (in style, not just CPU):
Verbose blocks
Condensed if
Inline if
Ternary
One-line execution
Macro-driven execution
Chained expressions
Functional/lambda-style
Happy coding and trading and remember, proper risk management is what keeps you in the game.
Comments 0